Red Light Therapy Pulsing: Worthless Or Useful? A Science Breakdown

Red light therapy (RLT) has surged in popularity over the past decade, praised for its potential benefits in skin rejuvenation, pain relief, muscle recovery, and even mental health. But within the world of RLT, a debate rages: Is pulsing red light therapy more effective than continuous wave therapy, or is it just a marketing gimmick?

Some companies claim that pulsing light at specific frequencies enhances cellular response, while skeptics argue there’s little scientific backing for these claims. So, who’s right?

In this deep dive, we’ll explore:

The science behind red light therapy
What pulsing means and how it works
Current research on pulsed vs. continuous RLT
Whether pulsing is worth the extra cost
Expert opinions and practical recommendations

By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of whether pulsing is a breakthrough or just hype.

The Basics of Red Light Therapy

Before diving into pulsing, let’s quickly recap how red light therapy works.

How RLT Affects Cells

RLT delivers low-wavelength red and near-infrared (NIR) light (typically 600-850nm) to the skin and underlying tissues. This light is absorbed by mitochondria, the energy powerhouses of cells, stimulating the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)—the molecule that fuels cellular repair and regeneration.

Key benefits of RLT include:

Enhanced collagen production (reduces wrinkles, improves skin texture)
Reduced inflammation (helps with joint pain, arthritis, and muscle recovery)
Improved circulation (speeds up healing)
Neuroprotective effects (may help with brain function and mood)

Continuous Wave vs. Pulsed Light

Most RLT devices emit continuous wave (CW) light, meaning the light stays on at a steady intensity. Pulsed light, however, rapidly turns on and off at specific frequencies (measured in Hertz, Hz).

Proponents argue that pulsing:

Mimics natural biological rhythms
Prevents cellular adaptation (avoiding diminished returns)
Enhances penetration and effectiveness

But does the science support this?

The Theory Behind Pulsing

The Concept of Photobiomodulation (PBM) and Frequency

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is the scientific term for light therapy’s effects on cells. Some researchers suggest that pulsing light at certain frequencies can optimize cellular responses.

For example:

10 Hz has been studied for pain relief and nerve regeneration.
40 Hz (gamma frequency) is being researched for cognitive benefits.
Flicker effects (rapid on-off cycles) may influence mitochondrial activity differently than continuous light.

Potential Advantages of Pulsing

Avoids Overexposure – Just like muscles adapt to exercise, cells might become less responsive to constant light. Pulsing could prevent this.
Deeper Penetration – Some studies suggest pulsed light penetrates tissue more effectively.
Frequency-Specific Effects – Different frequencies might trigger unique biological responses (e.g., pain relief vs. skin repair).

But is there solid evidence?

The Science of Pulsed vs. Continuous RLT

What Studies Say

Research on pulsed RLT is still emerging, but here’s what we know so far:

1. Pain Relief & Inflammation

A 2017 study in Lasers in Medical Science found that pulsed 10 Hz NIR light reduced inflammation more effectively than continuous light in rats.
Another 2020 study in Pain Research and Management reported that pulsed 808nm laser therapy provided better pain relief for knee osteoarthritis than continuous light.

2. Muscle Recovery & Performance

A 2019 study in Journal of Athletic Training found that pulsed light (50 Hz) improved muscle recovery post-exercise compared to continuous light.
However, a 2021 meta-analysis in Sports Medicine concluded that while RLT helps recovery, there wasn’t enough evidence to confirm pulsing was superior.

3. Skin Rejuvenation

Most studies on collagen production and anti-aging use continuous light, with strong results.
A 2022 study in Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine tested pulsed vs. continuous light for wrinkles and found no significant difference.

4. Brain & Cognitive Benefits

40 Hz pulsed light is being explored for Alzheimer’s and cognitive enhancement (e.g., MIT’s “flicker therapy” studies).
However, this research is still in early stages and not yet mainstream in consumer RLT devices.

The Verdict So Far

Pulsing may offer benefits for pain and inflammation based on some studies.
For skin and general wellness, continuous light appears just as effective.
Frequency-specific effects (like 40 Hz for brain health) are promising but need more research.

Is Pulsing Worth the Extra Cost?

Many high-end RLT devices now offer pulsing modes, often at a premium price. But should you pay extra?

Pros of Pulsed RLT Devices

✅ Potential for enhanced pain relief (if using the right frequency).
✅ May improve muscle recovery slightly better than continuous light.
✅ Emerging research on brain benefits (e.g., 40 Hz for cognition).

Cons of Pulsed RLT Devices

❌ Limited conclusive evidence that pulsing is better for most uses.
❌ Higher cost—pulsing features can double the price of a device.
❌ Risk of marketing hype—some companies exaggerate benefits without strong proof.

Who Should Consider Pulsed RLT?

Athletes looking for every possible edge in recovery.
Chronic pain sufferers who haven’t responded to continuous RLT.
Early adopters interested in experimental frequencies (e.g., 40 Hz for brain health).

For most people, a high-quality continuous wave device will suffice.

Expert Opinions & Practical Recommendations

What Researchers Say

Dr. Michael Hamblin (a leading PBM researcher) has noted that pulsing could have benefits but isn’t yet a must-have feature.
Many clinicians still prefer continuous light for consistency and proven results.

How to Choose an RLT Device

For general wellness/skin health: A continuous wave panel or handheld device is sufficient.
For pain/muscle recovery: A device with both continuous and pulsed modes (e.g., 10-50 Hz) could be worth testing.
Avoid overpaying for pulsing unless studies clearly support its use for your specific need.

Final Verdict: Is Pulsing Worth It?

Not useless—some evidence suggests benefits for pain and recovery.
Not essential—continuous RLT works well for most applications.
Watch for future research—especially on frequency-specific effects like 40 Hz for brain health.

Conclusion

The debate over pulsed vs. continuous red light therapy isn’t settled yet. While pulsing shows promise in certain areas (like pain relief and muscle recovery), continuous light remains the gold standard for most users.

If you’re curious about pulsing, look for a device that offers both modes so you can compare. But don’t feel pressured to pay extra for pulsing unless you have a specific reason.

VELLGUS Elite V2

THE #1 RATED RED LIGHT DEVICE

Vellgus Red Light Elite V2 is an incredible way to experience the benefits of multiwave technology spectrum: 480nm 630nm, 660nm, 810nm, 830nm, 850nm. No other red/NIR light device available provides the multi-wave R+| NIR+ spectral output.

VELLGUS pro V2

THE #1 RATED FULL BODY RED LIGHT DEVICE

Immerse yourself in the power and healing benefits of natural light therapy with the New Vellgus Pro V2 model. The New 2024 Vellgus Pro V2 is an incredible way to experience the benefits of multiwave technology spectrum: 480nm 630nm, 660nm, 810nm, 830nm, 850nm.

ADD TO CART

As research evolves, we may discover more about how different light frequencies affect the body. For now, the best approach is to stick with proven methods while keeping an eye on emerging science.